The ecosystem of the OpenClinic GA open source hospital information management software HEALTH FACILITY INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INTEROPERABILITY FRANK VERBEKE, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL OpenClinic login http://ice.minf.be/openclinic login: vub password: guest FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL HIS Models: interfaced systems ◦ Best of breed ◦ Natural growth path for EHR functionality ◦ Populating of Clinical Data Repository by HIS components through ◦ Interfaces ◦ Clinical Data Dictionary ◦ Advantages ◦ Progressive system expansion ◦ Select best products available ◦ Disadvantages ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ High costs of data integration Many interfaces to maintain & support Multiple vendor management Complex backup policy System availability harder to manage FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Interfaced systems Pharmacy Lab X-Ray ADT MPI Interfaces Clinical Data Dictionary Clinical Data Repository CPOE Nursing system Clinical documentation Reporting FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Other HIS Models: integrated systems ◦ Unified database ◦ Single database, not necessarily single vendor = Clinical Data Repository ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Minimizes/eliminates need for interfaces Becoming more popular in inpatient environments Standard in outpatient/private practice environments Advantages ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Single vendor No interfaces required Complete data integration Efficient backup management System availability easier to manage ◦ Disadvantages ◦ Single vendor may not provide best solution for every component FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Integrated systems Pharmacy Lab X-Ray ADT MPI Clinical Data Repository / shared database CPOE Nursing system Clinical documentation Reporting FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Other HIS modules & interoperability issues Patient identification Human resource management Health insurance management & universal health coverage Clinical coding Electronic medical record Nursing system Lab information management system Medical imaging Pharmacy management Health reporting FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Patient identification Unique patient identifiers at different levels: universal, national, subnational, health facility, departmental ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Universal: biometrics (fingerprints, retina scan) National: national ID registries, ID cards (machine readable) Subnational: health facility groups, health programs, ID cards (machine readable) Health facility: ID cards (machine readable), Health record IDs Departmental: Health record IDs Commonly used weak identifiers ◦ Last name, First name, Date of birth, Phone numbers Privacy risks Interoperability issues ◦ Shared master patient index at the highest practically achievable level ◦ Multi-criteria patient searches FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Human resource management Keep track of ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Work contracts Work schedules Skills Leave Training & education Salary & payments Interoperability issues ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Health worker identification: national registration bodies, professional councils. User ID cards, fingerprint identification (attendance control systems) Single sign on issues, access rights management (account deactivation!) Centralization of (public) health sector workforce data (iHRIS, NHIS, GIS) FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Health Insurance Management Health insurer identification ◦ Health insurer registry Health insurer coverage plan management ◦ Simple reimbursement plans (percentage, lump sum) ◦ Complex reimbursement plans ◦ Insurer specific reimbursement base (supplements charged to patient) ◦ Different reimbursement rules for in- and out-patients ◦ Limitations of number of reimbursable health services per period of time or episode of care (e.g. ultrasounds / pregnancy) ◦ Complementary health insurance plans (very poor patients, HIV+, public servants…) Multiple health insurance schemes possible for each patient Interoperability issues ◦ Health services nomenclature missing or unreliable ◦ Verification of health insurance status of a patient ◦ Electronic transmission of invoiced items from care provider to health insurer FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Clinical coding Reasons for encounter & diagnostics ◦ International classifications: ICD-10, ICPC-2, DSM-4, SNOMED ◦ Many local classifications (not standardized) ◦ Need for coding aid (insufficiently skilled health workers) ◦ Clinical thesaurus (3BT), keyword & clinical concept based) ◦ Multi-classification coding (code mapping) ◦ Complementary information ◦ Certainty ◦ Seriousness / gravity (Burden of disease – WHO) ◦ Problem list management Disability Adjusted Life Years DALYx = YLLx + YLDx Where: • DALYx = DALY for clinical condition x • YLLx = Years of Life Lost due to premature death caused by clinical condition x • YLDx = Years Lived with Disability caused by clinical condition x • = [Incidence x] x [Average disability duration x] x [weight x] DRG reporting Interoperability issues ◦ Code mapping onto national clinical databases (DHIS2, Global Health Barometer, NHIS & GIS) ◦ Linguistic issues (lack of translation, different clinical concepts in different languages) FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Electronic Medical Record Many different clinical documentation needs for different specialties ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Specific content for the health care sub-domain (HIV, Diabetes, Stomatology, Gynecology…) Different medical schools & health professional individualism Level and objectives of the health facility Workload Qualifications of care providers Diagnostic capabilities Standardization of clinical content ◦ Lots of free text, minimal use of international standards in routine clinical documentation Interoperability issues ◦ Electronic transfer of clinical information between health facilities ◦ Combining the general medical record with vertical health program records FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Nursing system Interaction with physicians’ order entry modules ◦ Drug prescriptions ◦ Care prescriptions ◦ Diagnostic prescriptions (lab, medical imaging) Nursing health record ◦ Biometrics & vital signs ◦ In-patient follow-up records ◦ Limited access to diagnostic & pharmaceutical prescribing Integration with billing modules FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Lab information management system Identification of lab analyses ◦ Internal laboratory codes, exceptional use of internationally standardized LOINC codes ◦ Reference values management ◦ Result editor management Lab order entry ◦ Lab order profiles & lab prescription normalization, integration with billing ◦ Hospital wide, departmental or user specific lab order forms ◦ SMS & email notification of results availability Lab results data entry ◦ Specialized editors (numerical, option lists, microbiology) ◦ Traceability Interoperability issues ◦ Automatic lab analyzers (sample identification, results transmission) ◦ Lab results messaging systems (SMS gateway, SMTP gateway) ◦ Microbiology reporting (WHONET) FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Medical Imaging Identification in radiology & other imaging procedures ◦ Internal procedure codes, exceptional use of CPT codes ◦ Study, series, instance, modality, operator identification… Computerized Order Entry ◦ Order identification &tracking ◦ Radiology workflow management -> efficiency Modality connectivity ◦ HL7, DICOM ◦ Integration of (DICOM) images in electronic health record (DCM4CHE & WEASIS) Regional PACS solutions ◦ ImageHub, AfriPACS FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Medical Imaging not part of a holistic patient approach today in low resource settings • Film & development products costs • Supply chain problems Digital imaging offers major opportunities: • Cost reduction • Computerized Radiology • Digital Radiology FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Pharmacy management Pharmaceutical products management ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Packaging Dose, dispensing schema Billing International ATC codes Pharmaceutical stock management ◦ Multiple stocks ◦ Batch management ◦ Traceability (pharmacovigilance) Order management Reporting FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Health reporting Many health data from different information sources ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Health facility context (level, management, covered population…) Financial activity (income, expenses, capital, investments, immovable) Health insurance & universal health coverage (e.g. free health care programs) Clinical activity (out-patient, in-patient, RFE, diagnostics, target health programs) Operating theatre activity Pharmacy (stock information, pharmaceutical in/out transactions) Lab activity (analyses performed, analysis results distributions) Medical imaging Human resources information (HRH category numbers, recruitments, discharges) Interoperability issues ◦ Lack of international/regional standardization of data elements & health indicators ◦ DHIS2, iHRIS, NHIS, Health insurances ◦ Different coding systems used for the same data, different aggregation criteria (age classes, gender…) ◦ Lack of international aggregate data reporting protocol (SDMX-HD abandoned, DXF2?) ◦ DHIS-2 middleware API, IMIA-HELINA CHEDAR initiative, WHO/Unicef initiatives ◦ Many different legacy national & health program reporting instruments to support FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL The Global Health Barometer project International datawarehouse for health related information ◦ Monitoring & evaluation ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Financial data Morbidity Mortality Human resources ◦ Operational support ◦ Nearly real time bed occupancy information ◦ Server performance ◦ ID card production Integration with other datawarehouse projects based on DHIS-2 FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL IMIA Global Health Informatics & Interoperability WG Bring together experiences & identify solutions for the global health sector Share Open Source modules and components Standardize information and methods in healthcare Frank Verbeke, [email protected] http://sourceforge.net/projects/open-clinic/ FRANK VERBEKE, BISI, VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL