49 IV. Gallery and Architect PETER CANNON-BROOKES At the Press Conference organized by the Tate Gallery, 2 December 1986, representatives of the media had the opportunity of visiting the Clore Gallery, by then almost complete, and asking questions of all concerned with the project. The genesis of the designs and the evolution of the all-important lighting system have already been discussed, and it falls to the present author to review the building as constructed and place it in the context of James Stirling’s museum and art gallery designs. In fulfilling the requirements of the Brief, the Architect was constrained by the narrow financial limitations and the need to relate the new structure satisfactorily to both the now existing Tate Gallery building and the former Hospital Commandant’s House, called The Lodge, in the eastern corner of the site. Indeed, the exigencies of this site, including the locations of the hospital buildings to be retained, and the close proximity of the new structure to the boldly massed forms of the 1897 fasade of the Tate Gallery, suggested the outlines of many of the solutions adopted by the Architect, but the characterization of the original Gallery building merely as an example of ‘Free Classicism’ is not only careless but misleading. The construction subsequently of the wide embankment with its expanse of tarmac and raised parapet, has imposed fundamental changes on the relationship between the faqade of the Gallery and the River Thames, and most architectural critics have failed to notice the very strong elements of Venetian 17th century architecture displayed by Sidney Smith’s design. Originally the Gallery was intended to be seen across the wide expanse of the river, and circa 1900 the overall effect, in winter, must have echoed a Canaletto etching. More specifically, the debt is to Baldassare Longhena, and few of the generations of art historians visiting the Tate Gallery seem to have realized that the central octagon is in fact a remarkably faithful copy, on a reduced scale, of the main rotunda of S. Maria della Salute in Venice. However, this Venetian theme has not been exploited by the Architect and in his ‘architectural conversation’ between the Main Entrance faGade of the Clore Gallery and the corner pavilion of the 1897 faqade, facing it across the newly created piazzetta, and open towards the Thames, there is only a loose counterpoint established, while the treatment of the exterior of the Clore Gallery reveals instead the full gamut of James Stirling’s architectural idiosyncrasies. The Clore Gallery is an L-shaped block and the articulation of the exterior provides few hints concerning its internal organization. However, the height and general design of the entablature carried round at roof level is established by that of the 1897 building, and the space below is divided up, for most of the exterior, into a square gridwork, four panels high. In the corner where the Clore Gallery meets the north-eastern range of the 1897 building, now adjacent to the new Schools’ Entrance, the two systems of articulation meet and the first level of Portland Stone ashlar banding is seen to match up partially with the top course of the rusticated basement of the 1897 design. On the other hand, the discontinuities evident between the string course and other mouldings of the old building and the ashlar banding of the new are ignored, presumably because of the Tate Gallery’s stated intention to bury this area within the new Sculpture Galleries The Clore Gallery: 50 IV 22. Main Entrance and piazzetta area of the Clore Gallery. The top edge of the heavy timber pergola and the base of the benches set within its concrete plinth continue the line of the heavily rusticated ground floor of Sidney Smith’s I897 Tate Gallery building. are certainly Phase A of the New Museums Project. These discontinuities less abrasive in the piazzettu area, in part due to the reduction of the gridwork to the upper 21/2 levels only for the faqade facing south-east. The infill of the square panels of the gridwork is usually of coloured plaster, but, as the south-east range approaches the Lodge, this is replaced by an infilling of matching brickwork rising to form a stepped planned for 23. School’s Entrance of the Clore Gallery. The glazed screen is approached down steps, or down a ramp, from the coach and car park entered from John Islip Street at the rear of the site. PETER CANON-BROOKES 51 24. Main Entrance to the Clore Gallery and the East Elevation facing the Lodge. The motif of panels of dark red facing bricks set within the gridwork of Portland Stone derives from the materials used for the Lodge, and the broken cornice makes a strong feature of the windows of the curatorial offices. over the recessed corner windows of the Reading Room. In this area the Architect also breaks up the parapet/attic forms above the entablature with deep window recesses, and re-establishes the gridwork again above. Set back on the roof is part of the air-conditioning plant, and the wooden lattice screen which forms a balustrade will in due course be covered with trailing creepers which, when mature, will cascade down the ‘Growies’, as they have been christened by the Architect, are an exterior of this pavilion. important part of many of his designs, but it remains to be seen whether, as in Stuttgart, provision should have been made for soil heating in order to prevent their roots freezing in mid-winter. Set between the end pavilion and the picture galleries range of the Clore Gallery, the Main Entrance is established by a vast negative pedimental shape cut low down through the smooth ashlar identifying this section. The space thereby created is filled with a screen of square glazed panels framed in the same apple-green Syntha Pulvin finish as used in Stuttgart, with a central pillbox and revolving door. When questioned on his ideas behind the design of this area, Stirling replied (2 December 1986) that he intended for this entrance a garden house effect. For him the act of entering the Clore Gallery at this point should not exactly be an urban experience, more that of entering the annexe or orangery of a great house. The choice of green was deliberate since ‘white has other associations-naval, suburban, . . .‘, and he confirmed that the colours had been selected by him with the agreement of the Trustees of the Tate Gallery. Not surprisingly, the choice of colours within the Clore Gallery building has been of crucial importance and the Director of the Tate Gallery, Alan Bowness, differentiated between the ‘public side’ in which no works of art were exhibited and the Architect could be allowed a relatively free hand, and the ‘paintings side’ in which much tighter control was appropriate. Within the Main Entrance Hall the green of the screen provides the strongest colouristic element at ground level since the floor is of naturally cleaved York Stone close to the screen or polished London Pink Granite (from Scotland), and the walls are pale in colour (Fragrance). However, a more vigorous note is struck by the dominant, squat column formed of a white cube set diagonally on a larger pigeon-grey cube, set in turn on a high black cylinder-useful, in the opinion of the Architect, to leave your glass on, design 25. Interior of the Main Entrance Hall of the ;;r ,“,“lk,; ko,“z formation counter towards the glazed screen and central revolving door. although it also performs a structural function. From the Main Entrance Hall access is gained, on this level, to the Reading Room facing the Lodge, and, past the massive white oak-veneered sales and information counter, to the Auditorium and, beyond, the Classroom and related facilities. Directly opposite the entrance screen the space opens up to the full height of the building, drawing the visitor up the staircase to the main gallery level. Given the size and orientation of the ranges composing the Clore Gallery, it was not possible to insert a staircase leading away from the immediate point of entry, and instead the Architect chose to develop his staircase design so that it rose in two flights across the rear of the space. The original intention was that it should rise directly to the powerful archway defining the entrance to the galleries-a solution reminiscent of the Sackler Museum at Harvard-but this would have had a disastrous effect on the functional planning of the Main Entrance Hall, and the orientation of the staircase was accordingly reversed, thereby creating instead diagonal movement across a layered space. The powerful archway motif was, nevertheless, retained, and painted Viola (purple) and Brasilia (bright blue); this provides an almost strident advertisement for the treasures beyond. The treatment of the staircase complex, with a gridwork of square panels (Apricot and Fragrance) on the south-east facing wall contrasted with otherwise plain plasterwork (again cf. the Sackler Museum Staircase with its references to the articulation of the exterior of the building), and a double-pitched glazed roof with green glazing bars above. The Staircase is undoubtedly the most dramatic space within the ‘public side’ and Stirling has stated that the archway/window structure is intended to be ‘a signal to the colours’, but the debate will public . . . having a certain presence, with strong, vibrating be long and fierce about the appropriateness of such signals for a gallery dedicated to the work of an early 19th century painter who was, above all, the greatest colourist. The main gallery level is the same as that of the main suite of galleries in the old building, so as to allow easy access between the two, and nine large galleries are provided (eight with daylight). The complex is entered, from the Staircase, into the largest galleries, one rectangular gallery (107), which in turn opens into two smaller rectangular for early oil-paintings by Turner (108) and the other (109), with artificial lighting only, PETER CANON-BROOKES 53 intended for the display of a changing selection of his drawings and water-colours. Gallery 104, along the axis of the building, is vaulted, and apart from providing the direct access to the long Gallery 101 housing Turner’s late paintings, it opens into four flanking galleries (102, 103, 105 and 106) w h ic h are identical except that Gallery 105 has the bay window overlooking the entrance piazzetta and the Thames. The planning of these galleries is exceptionally skilled and, apart from the plum-coloured walls of Gallery 109, their walls are treated en suite, providing a hanging line of almost 300 m. However, the Brief laid down that the gallery interiors ‘should be sympathetic to the works of art and 26. The the full Staircase, flooring Apricot 27. Within the Staircase area of the Clore Gallery the approach to the Primary Galleries is dominated by the brilliant bands of colourpurple (Viola) and bright blue (Brasilia)-which define the powerful archway motif. Main Entrance Hall opens up to height of the building over the and the London Pink Granite contrasts with the square panels of and Fragrance used for the walls. 54 The Clore Gallery: IV honour them’, and the question immediately arises as to the desirability, in the pursuit of that aim, of disregarding Turner’s own strong views as to the environment in which he wished his paintings to be displayed. Stirling’s designs mark a sharp break with the dark walls and floors preferred in the 19th century, and Alan Bowness stated at the press conference that the pale fabric was selected by the Trustees because it was similar to that used in the Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, and had worked well there. That opinion is by no means universal, and even were it so, the compromise sought in the Yale Center, for a wide range of paintings of all periods, hardly applies to a suite of galleries permanently dedicated to a single artist whose opinions on the subject were well documented (see Figure 35). A full-scale mock-up of a section of one of these galleries had been constructed in a Tate Gallery store, originally in order to test the lighting systems being developed, but this was subsequently used in the selection process for the wall fabrics, carpets, timbers, etc. Thus there must have been considerable reservations concerning the appropriateness of a pale cream cotton fabric for the background to paintings of this type, with their worn gilt frames, often obscured by varying amounts of discoloured varnish; and the same questions apply to the selection of the cafe-au-lait carpet and the pale oak used for the gallery surrounds, etc., though the galleries themselves are elegant and the quality of the natural light is generally very good. Consequently fears have been voiced that the Trustees, in taking themselves the decision as to the selection of these colours, were more influenced by the presumed requirements of the Post-Modern architecture than those of Turner’s paintings, and that because the displays are basically static, it will be many years before the replacement of the wall fabrics (together with the carpets) will be economically justifiable. Unfortunately, the ‘signal to the public’ provided on the Staircase has proved to be just that’. Apart from the problems posed by the colours, one of the main reservations is to be directed at the bay window structure which was demanded by the Trustees and seriously mars Gallery 105. It is virtually impossible to reconcile such a structure with the design of a symmetrical gallery and, unless the window faces north, the penetration of sunlight cannot be controlled effectively without seriously compromising the view to the exterior which is the v&on d'&reof the window. Consequently, in the light of bitter experience, most museum designers today seek to sidestep the problems by locating such look-out points outside the main display areas. Other serious problems are posed by the visual 28. Gallery 104, looking towards Gallery 101. The picture-hanging zone, between the projecting skirting and the bold half-round nonfunctional timber rail, is covered with a lightcoloured fabric which tones in with the pale carpet. PETER CANON-BROOKES 55 29. Interior of Gallery 101 showing the sources of natural and artificial light. The visual strength of the ceiling structures of the Clore Gallery presents problems, accentuated by the oculi that pierce some of them. 30. Ceiling structure of Gallery 108 of the Chore Gallery. strength of the ceiling structures, with their sharply faceted covings and insistent central shapes. Indeed, it is difficult to justify the oculi piercing them, except on narrowly architectural grounds, since far from being functional these bright sources of light act only as visual distractions, and, with good reason, it might have been assumed that the terms of the Brief had precluded such self-indulgences. These difficulties serve to question the extent to which it is in fact possible to reconcile the aesthetic criteria imposed by the display of 19th century paintings with the creation of a thoroughgoing Post-Modern gallery interior. In Stuttgart the problems did not arise, in that the gallery interiors are closely in tune with the 20th century art which they were created by Stirling to contain, whilst in the Neue Pinakothek in Munich the gallery interiors designed by Alexander von Branca for 19th century paintings avoided the worst difficulties by reinterpreting the basic forms of Klenze’s designs, in contrast to the very personal qualities of the exterior of the building and its ‘public side’. In the Clore Gallery the rooms of the ‘public side’ are often of considerable distinction and both the Auditorium and the Reading Room combine multiple functions with ingenious planning and not a little panache. In the former is revealed, to good effect, the Architect’s audacious use of colour, as well as his penchant for heated handrails, whilst the Reading Room is equipped with its own kitchenette for small receptions, etc., and can be blacked out for audiovisual displays. Similar care and ingenuity has been applied to the design of the Viewing Room, in which opinions are to be given on works of art brought in by the public, and to the fitting out of the Classroom which can accept up to 50 children. These floors are either carpeted or covered in studded rubber of the type familiar from Stuttgart, though in a modest dark brown instead of the brilliant green 56 The Clove Gallevy: IV 31. Interior of the Clore Gallery Auditorium with seating for 199 persons and comprehensive equipment in the projection and sound room which also serves Classroom beyond. the preferred there! A rather different colour scheme characterizes the Reserve Galleriesthe Gallery staff would appear to have won here-and the deep red painted walls (woodchip paper on blockboard linings on studwork) are closely hung with the remaining approximately 170 oil-paintings by Turner in the collections. In their naked glory late in 1968 it was difficult to visualize the effect of the massed paintings in the Reserve Galleries, but there can be no doubt that, notwithstanding the artificial lighting and the dead spaces on the end walls, it is here that we come closest to Turner’s own intentions. The plan is that these displays will be ‘topped up’ with other paintings from the Historic British Collection, when required, in order to maintain the overall effect and style of hanging, as well as to maximize the use of the display spaces available to the Tate Gallery. As in the primary suite of galleries, there are no permanent barriers to separate visitors from the paintings, and reliance is placed upon the psychological barriers provided by the oak surrounds of the flooring. These are unusually narrow and much less than the arm’s length usually deemed necessary in order to discourage visitors from It remains to be seen whether this protection will be touching the paint surfaces. adequate in practice-not least in the light of the experience gained in the Burrell Collection Museum, and Alan Bowness’s anticipation of at least half a million additional visitors every year. Within the context of the supporting facilities, particular attention must be paid to the Study Room and the Paper Conservation Department. The former provides print-room workspaces of the standard type for twelve students, beneath a high north-facing window, and it is intended by the Gallery that a limited number of large Turner water-colours can be shown within this area. However, the sunlight reflected from the glazed surfaces of the Millbank Tower beyond has necessitated a comprehensive system of blinds which should have been unnecessary, and specialists needing to study Turner’s works on paper under stronger daylight are provided with a separate bench facility. All those working in the Study Room are under the surveillance of the Study Room Supervisor seated within the raised central structure (into which have been incorporated the card index cabinets) and of staff working on the mezzanine level which occupies half the space. Time and experience alone will provide the basis for assessing the effectiveness 57 PETER CANON-BROOKES 32. Within the Reading Room of the Clore Gallery the prominent concrete spiral staircase gives access to the small mezzanine office area located on top of the kitchenette which provides modest catering facilities for this area. 33. The Paper Conservation Studio is an important facility provided by the new Clore Gallery, and the intensity of the natural light, in particular any reflected light from the Millbank Tower nearby, is controlled by electrically operated blinds. The structural column has proved to be a considerable inconvenience. of this design and the adequacy of the storage capacity for framed works on paper. The latter is perhaps too modest when it is recalled that this print room, in parallel to that reserved by the Tate Gallery for the Modern Collection, is intended to serve the present and future needs of the entiI;e Historic British Collection. On the other hand, the Paper Conservation Department has been operating successfully in its new premises since the autumn of 1986 and services the existing Tate Gallery collections as well as the Turner Collection. The generous space provided allows very large works on paper to be The Clore Gallery: IV ,___-_ ,W._.~. 4 ., -- 59 PETER CANON-BROOKES 34 (opposite). The wide variety of window designs is always an exciting element in James Stirling’s buildings, and the Clore Gallery is not disappointing in this respect. conserved and the Crown Suppliers are particularly proud of the specially adapted laboratory furniture which has been installed. This includes a table with a surface area of over 250ft2 made of LOO-year-old mahogany cuIjboards rescued from the British Museum (Natural History)! The Paper Conservation Department, and the associated framing workshops, are served by the goods lift which, inter ufiu, links it to the main gallery level and that of the Study Room. From the technical viewpoint, the Clore Gallery establishes within the United Kingdom important new standards with regard to the environmental conditions under which the works are displayed and stored. It is boasted that daylight alone is utilized for some 70 per cent of the hours during which the galleries are open to the public and only outside these times is artificial lighting required to top up or replace daylight. This is, or soon will be, combined with the facility of blacking out these spaces at all other times, whilst the entire monitoring and control of the environmental conditions lies with a single computer provided with seasonal programming. Nevertheless, the airconditioning plant is intended, under normal operating conditions, not to exceed 50 or 70 per cent loading, of the air-handlers and chillers respectively, allowing a generous margin of reserve capacity, and yet plant and services are limited to only 8 per cent of the gross building area. These impressive technological achievements have to be set alongside the all-important ‘paintings side’ of the new Clore Gallery and any assessment of the extent to which the gallery interiors are ‘sympathetic to the works of art and honour them’. In the event, the detailed decisions with regard to the interiors of the main suite of galleries have been taken with greater concern for the 20th century building than for the 19th century paintings, and notwithstanding the care lavished by the Architect and the professional museum staff alike, the environment for the paintings finally achieved is seriously at variance to them. In this James Stirling is in many respects also a victim. 35. Interior of Turner’s Gallery, by George Jones (c. 1852), The Ashmolean Museum, Oxford. In his second Gallery, in Queen Anne Street, London, designed in 1819, J. M. W. Turner took as the basis of his design Sir John Soane’s Dulwich Gallery. This painting reveals the discreet toplighting and deep red walls demanded by Turner for the display of his own paintings. (Photo: Ashmolean Museum, Oxford) The Clove Gallery: Appendix 60 Note 1. One is reminded, perhaps, of James Stirling’s own comments quoted in the exhibition catalogue of This is Tomorrow (1956, Whitechapel Art Galfery, London): ‘Why clutter up your building with ‘pieces’ of sculpture when the architect can make his medium so exciting that the need for sculpture will be done away with . the painting is as obsolete as the picture rail. Architecture, one of the practical arts, has along with the popular arts, deflated the position of painters and sculptors-the fine arts.’ Appendix: Clore Gallery Scheduie of Accommodation (square metres net) Ground Floor (entrance level) Floor area (m’) Public Areas (4 Education Department Auditorium (199 seats) Projection/Sound room Classroom Store Floor totals area (m’) 220.0 25.0 64.0 7.5 316.5 (b) Cened Reading room Servery Viewing room Cloaks/Publications/Information Cloaks storage Toilets counter 59.0 7.5 10.0 22.0 24.0 40.0 165.2 Cc) Primary Circulation 296.0 296.0 Staff Areas (4 Paper Conservation Department Studio Guillotine/Frame storage room Framing workshop Rest room/Office Toilets General circulation/Goods lobby 113.0 74.0 52.5 36.0 10.5 33.5 319.5 (b) Stkpervisors Rest room Locker rooms/Toilets 41.0 42.0 83.0 (cl Clean& Store 4.0 & (4 Secondary Circulation 40 10.0 10.0