291 Bibliography Abney, Steve. 1987. The English

Bibliography
Abney, Steve. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D. Dissertation,
MIT.
Adger, David. 2003. Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexopoulou, Theodora and Frank Keller. to appear. ‘Locality, Cyclicity and Resumption: At
the Interface between the Grammar and the Human Sentence Processor.’ Language.
Baayen, R. Harald. ‘Het Anti-Corpus-Axioma.’ Nederlandse taalkunde 3: 131-136.
Bard, Ellen, Dan Robertson and Antonella Sorace. 1996. ‘Magnitude estimation of linguistic
acceptability.’ Language 72: 1-31.
Beghelli, Filippo & Tim Stowell. 1997. ‘Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of
Each and Every.’ In Anna Szabolcsi, (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Behrens, Leila. 2005. 'Genericity from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective.’ Linguistics 43, 275344.
Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. ‘Psych-Verbs and (Theta)-Theory.’ Natural
Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291-352.
Bennis, Hans. 1979 ‘Appositie en de Interne Struktuur van de NP.’ Spektator 8: 209-228.
Bernstein, Judy B. 2001. ‘The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal
Domain.’ In M. Baltin and Ch. Collins (eds.) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic
Theory. Malden, Mass./Oxford: Blackwell, 536-561.
Borsley, Rober D. & Richard Ingham. 2002 ‘Grow your own Linguistics? On some Applied
Linguists’ Views of the Subject.’ Lingua 112: 1-6.
Borsley, Robert D. and Richard Ingham. 2003. ‘More on ‘Some Applied Linguists’: A
response to Stubbs.’ Lingua 113: 193-196
Bosveld-de Smet, Leonie. On Mass and Plural Quantification: The case of French des/duNPs. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen.
Broekhuis, Hans. 2005. Derivations (MP) and Evaluations (OT). Handout of a paper
presented at ‘Descriptive and Explanatory Adequacy in Linguistics’, December 17-19,
2000, Berlin.
Broekhuis, Hans, Evelien Keizer & Marcel den Dikken. 2003. Modern Grammar of Dutch.
Nouns and Noun Phrases. Occasional Papers 4. Tilburg.
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1977. ‘Generic Sentences and Analyticity.’ Studies in
Language 1: 155-196.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michael Starke. 1996. ‘Deficient Pronouns: a View from Germanic: A
Study in the Unified Description of Germanic and Romance.’ In: Höskuldur Thráinsson,
Samuel David Epstein and Steve Peter (eds.) Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax
Volume II. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
291
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of
Massachusetts, Amherst. Published in 1980 in Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics.
New York: Garland.
Carlson, Gregory N. 1995. ‘Truth-Conditions of Generic Sentences.’ In: Gregory N. Carlson
& Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago/London: The University of
Chicago Press. 224-237.
Carlson, Gregory N., & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) 1995. The Generic Book.
Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. ‘Individual-Level Predicates as Inherent Generics.’
In: Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book.
Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. 176-223.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. ‘Reference to Kinds across Languages’. Natural Language
Semantics 6: 339-405.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York:
Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Generative Grammar: Its Basis, Development and Prospects. Kyto:
Kyto University of Foreign Studies.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. ‘Derivation by Phase.’ In: Michael Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: a Life
in Language. 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.
Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. ‘Issues in Adverbial Syntax.’ Lingua 114: 683—710.
Clark, Brady. 2005. ‘On Stochastic Grammar.’ Language 81: 207-217.
Clifton, Charles, Gisbert Fanselow & Lyn Frazier. 2006. ‘Amnestying Superiority Violations:
Processing Multiple Questions.’ Linguistic Inquiry 37: 51-68.
Cohen, Ariel. 1999. Think Generic! The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences. Stanford:
CSLI.
Cohen, Ariel. 2001. ‘On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars.’ Journal of Semantics 18:
183-209.
Cohen, Ariel. 2002. ‘Genericity.’ Linguistische Berichte 10: 59-89.
Cohen, Ariel. 2005. The Meaning of Bare Plurals: Evidence from Italian. Paper presented at
the Conference ‘Indefinites and Weak Quantifiers’, Brussels, January 6-8, 2005.
Cohen, Ariel & Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2002. `Topic, Focus, and the Interpretation of Bare
Plurals.' Natural Language Semantics 10: 125-165.
292
Colleman, Timothy. Datief-Alternantie in het Nederlands: een Corpusgebaseerd Onderzoek
naar de Dubbelobject-Constructie en zijn Prepositionele Varianten. Ph.D. Dissertation,
Ghent University.
Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen. 1975. ‘On Generics.’ In: Edward Keenan (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 99-111.
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dahl, Östen. 1995. ‘The Marking of the Episodic/Generic Distinction in Tense-Aspect
Systems.’ In: Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book.
Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. 412-425.
Dayal, Veneeta S. 1992. ‘The Singular-Plural Distinction in Hindi Generics.’ In: Proceedings
of SALT II, OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 40. Columbus: The Ohio State
University.
Dayal, Veneeta S. 2003. ‘Bare Nominals: Non-specific and Contrastive Readings under
Scrambling.’ In: Simin Karimi (ed.) Word Order and Scrambling, Malden, Mass.:
Blackwell.
De Caluwe, Johan. 2005. ‘Conflicting Language Conceptions within the Dutch Speaking Part
of Belgium.’ In: Rudolf Muhr (ed.) Standardvariationen und Sprachideologien in
verschiedenen Sprachkulturen der Welt / Standard Variations and Language Ideologies
in Different Language Cultures around the World. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag. 53-58.
Declerck Renaat. 1986. ‘The Manifold Interpretations of Generic Sentences.’ Lingua 68: 14988.
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. ‘The Origins of Genericity.’ Linguistics 29: 79-102.
De Hoop, Helen. 1998. ‘Partitivity.’ Glot International 3: 3-10.
De Hoop, Helen & Henriëtte De Swart. 1989. ‘Over Indefiniete Objecten en de Relatie tussen
Syntaxis en Semantiek.’ GLOT 12: 19-35.
De Hoop, Helen & Henriëtte De Swart. 1990. ‘Indefinite Objects.’ In: Rieneke Bok-Bennema
& Peter Coopmans (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris. 91-100.
De Hoop, Helen, Guido Vanden Wyngaerd & Jan-Wouter Zwart. 1990 ‘Syntaxis en
Semantiek van de Van die-Constructie.’ Gramma 14: 81-106.
De Jong, Franciska, Leonoor Oversteegen & Henk Verkuyl. 1988. Betekenis en
Taalstructuur: Inleiding in de Formele Semantiek. Dordrecht: Foris.
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian
Languages: A Comparative Study. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Lund.
De Mey, Sjaak. 1980. ‘Stages and Extensionality: The Carlson Problem.’ In: Saskia Daalder
& Marinel Gerritsen (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
191-202.
De Mey, Sjaak. 1981. ‘Intensional and Extensional Interpretation in Montague Grammar:
Plurals and Tenses.’ Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 181-192.
293
De Mey, Sjaak. 1982. ‘Aspects of the Interpretation of Bare Plurals.’ In: Saskia Daalder &
Marinel Gerritsen (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
115-126.
Déprez, Viviane. 2000. ‘Parallel (A)symmetries and the Internal Structure of Negative
Expressions.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 253–342.
De Schutter, Georges & Paul van Hauwermeiren. 1983. De Structuur van het Nederlands.
Taalbeschouwelijke Grammatica, Malle: De Sikkel.
De Swart, Henriëtte. 1996. ‘(In)definites and Genericity.’ In: Makoto Kanazawa, Christopher
J. Piñón & Henriëtte de Swart (eds.) Quantifiers, Deduction and Context. Stanford: CSLI
publications. 171-194.
Devos, Filip, Rik De Muynck & Mieke Van Herreweghe. 1991. Nederlands, Frans en Engels
in Contrast 1. De Nominale Constituent. Leuven: Peeters.
De Vries, Mark. 2005. ‘Ellipsis in Nevenschikking: Voorwaarts Deleren maar Achterwaarts
Delen.’ TABU 34: 13-46.
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1998. ‘Types of Predicates and the Representation of Existential
Readings.’ In: A. Lawson (ed.) Proceedings of SALT VII. Ithaca: Cornell University
Press.
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer 2001. ‘Movement Operations after Syntax.’ Linguistic Inquiry
2: 555-595.
Filip, Hana & Gregory N. Carlson 1997. ‘Sui Generis Genericity.’ Penn Working Papers in
Linguistics, Volume 4 (Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Penn Linguistics
Colloquium). Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania. 91-110.
Gerstner-Link, Claudia & Manfred Krifka. 1993. ‘Genericity.’ In: Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von
Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, Theo Vennemann (eds.) Handbuch der Syntax. Berlin:
Walter de Gruyter. 966-978.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Giorgi, Alessandra & Giuseppe Longobardi. 1991. The Syntax of Noun Phrases (Cambridge
Studies in Linguistics 57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenberg, Yael: 2002, ‘Two Types of Quantificational Modalized Genericity, and the
Interpretation of Bare Plurals and Indefinite Singular NPs.’ In: Proceedings of SALT 12.
CLC Publications, Cornell University.
Grondelaers, Stefan, Katrien Deygers, Hilde Van Aken, Vicky Van Den Heede, Dirk
Speelman. 2000. ‘Het CONDIV-Corpus Geschreven Nederlands.’ Nederlandse
Taalkunde 5, 356-363.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Second edition.
Oxford: Blackwell.
294
Haegeman, Liliane. 2004. ‘Verdubbeling van Subjectpronomina in de Zuid-Nederlandse
Dialecten: een Reactie uit Lapscheure.’ Taal en Tongval 56: 119-159.
Haeseryn, Walter, Karin Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooy & Maarten van den Toorn.
1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Second, revised edition. Groningen: Martinus
Nijhoff.
Hankamer, Jorge & Line Mikkelsen. 2005. ‘When Movement must be Blocked: A Reply to
Embick and Noyer.’ Linguistic Inquiry 36: 85-125.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D.
Dissertation. University of Massachussetts, Amherst. Published 1988 in Outstanding
Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland.
Heim, Irene. 1983. ‘File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness.’ In:
Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.) Meaning, Use and the
Interpretation of Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 164-189.
Hempel, Carl & Robert Oppenheim. 1936. Der Typusbegriff im Lichte der Neueren Logik.
Leiden: Sijhoff.
Heny, Frank. 1972. Review of Meaning and Structure of Language by Wallace Chafe.
College English 33: 908-929.
Heycock, Caroline & Roberto Zamparelli. 2003. ‘Coordinated Bare Definites.’ Linguistic
Inquiry 34: 443-469
Hinskens, Frans. 1993. ‘Dialectnivellering en Regiolectvorming; Bevindingen en
Beschouwingen.’ In: Frans Hinskens, Cor Hoppenbrouwers & Johan Taeldeman (eds.)
Dialectverlies en regiolectvorming (Taal en Tongval Themanummer 6). 40-61.
Hoeksema, Jack. 1983. ‘Plurality and Conjunction.’ In Alice ter Meulen (ed.) Studies in
Modeltheoretic Semantics (GRASS 1). Dordrecht: Foris.
Hoeksema, Jack. 1985. Categorial Morphology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen.
New York: Garland.
Hoeksema, Jack. 1998. ‘Corpusonderzoek naar Negatief-Polaire Uitdrukkingen.’ Tabu 28: 152.
Hoeksema, Jack. 1999. ‘Aantekeningen bij Ooit, Deel 2: De Opkomst van Niet-Polair Ooit.’
TABU 29: 147-172.
Hoeksema, Jack. 2000. ‘Verplichte Topicalisatie van Kale Enkelvouden: de Feit is datConstructie.’ TABU 30: 113-142.
Hoeksema, Jack. 2003. ‘Partitivity, Degrees and Polarity.’ Verbum XXV: 81-96
Hoeksema, Jack. 2004. De Negatief-Polaire Uitdrukkingen van het Nederlands. Inleiding en
Lexicon. Ms. University of Groningen.
Hoeksema, Jack & Dirk-Bart Den Ouden. 2005. ‘Positief- en Negatief-Polaire Bepalingen van
Graad: een Empirisch Onderzoek.’ Tabu 34: 129-144.
Hoppenbrouwers, Cor. 1990. Het regiolect, Van Dialect tot Algemeen Nederlands.
Muiderberg: Coutinho
295
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jansen, Frank & Raoul Wijnands. 2004. ‘Doorkruisingen van het Links-Rechtsprincipe.’
Neerlandistiek.nl 4.
Jullens, Jan. 1983. ‘Over Telwoorden en Congruentie.’ TABU 13, 107-120.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Klein, Henny. 1997. Adverbs of Degree in Dutch and Related Languages. Dissertation,
University of Groningen.
Klein, Maarten. 1980. ‘Anaforische Relaties in het Nederlands.’ In: M. Klein (ed.) Taalkundig
Beschouwd. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. 206-221.
Klein, Maarten. 1981. ‘De Interne Structuur van Partitieve Constructies.’ Spektator 10: 295309.
Klooster, Wim. 2001. Grammatica van het Hedendaags Nederlands: een Volledig Overzicht.
Den Haag: Sdu.
Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche. 1991. ‘The Position of Subjects.’ Lingua 85: 21158.
Kortmann, Bernd. 2002. New Prospects for the Study of English Dialect Syntax: Impetus from
Syntactic Theory and Language Typology. In: Barbiers, Sjef, Leonie Cornips & Suzanne
van der Kleij (eds.). Syntactic Microvariation (Meertens Institute Electronic Publications
in Linguistics II). Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. ‘Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates.’ In: Gregory N.
Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago/London: The
University of Chicago Press. 125-175.
Kress, Günther. 1993. ‘Cultural Considerations in Linguistic Description.’ In: David Graddol,
Linda Thompson & Mike Byram (eds.) Language and Culture. Clevedon: Multilingual
Matters. 1-22.
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. ‘Common Nouns in Chinese and English.’ In: Gregory N. Carlson &
Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago/London: The University of
Chicago Press. 398-411.
Krifka, Manfred. 2001. Kinds of Kind Reference. Handout of a paper presented at ‘Workshop
on Genericity’, University of Cologne, November 10, 2001.
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard
Link & Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. ‘Genericity: an Introduction.’ In: Gregory N. Carlson
& Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago/Londen: The University of
Chicago Press. 1-124.
Laca, Brenda. 1990. ‘Generic Objects: Some More Pieces to the Puzzle.’ Lingua 81: 25-46.
Lasnik, Howard & Juan Uriagereka with Cedric Boeckx. 2005. A Course in Minimalist
Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
Laury, Ritva & Tsuyoshi Ono. 2005. ‘Data is Data and Model is Model: You Don't Discard
the Data that doesn't Fit Your Model!’ Language 81: 218-225.
296
Lawler, John M. 1973. Studies in English Generics. Ph.D. Dissertation, University
of Michigan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics.
Link, Godehard. 1995. ‘Generic Information and Dependent Generics.’ In: Gregory N.
Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago/London: The
University of Chicago Press. 358-382.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. ‘Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in
Syntax and Logical Form.’ Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609-665.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1996. The Syntax of N-Raising: A Minimalist Theory. OTS Working
Papers. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2000. ‘“Postverbal” Subjects and the Mapping Hypothesis.’ Linguistic
Inquiry 31: 691-702.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. ‘How Comparative is Semantics? A Unified Parametric Theory
of Bare Nouns and Proper Names.’ Natural Language Semantics 9: 335-369.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2005. ‘Toward a Unified Grammar of Reference.’ In: Zeitschrift für
Sprachwissenschaft 24: 5-44.
Marelj, Marijana. 2004. Middles and Argument Structure across Languages. Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Utrecht.
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson 2001. Corpus Linguistics. second edition. Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press.
Marinis, Theorore. 2005. ‘Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Acquisition of the Definite
Article in Greek.’ In: Melita Stavrou and Arhonto Terzi (eds.) Advances in Greek
Generative Syntax (Linguistics Aktuell/Linguistics Today 76). Amsterdam/Philadelphia:
John Benjamins.
Meurers, Walt D. 2005. ‘On the Use of Electronic Corpora for Theoretical Linguistics. Case
Studies from the Syntax of German.’ Lingua 115: 1619-1639.
Meyer, Charles F. & Hongyin Tao. 2005. ‘Response to Newmeyer's 'Grammar is Grammar
and Usage is Usage'.’ Language 81: 226-228.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. ‘Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage.’ Language, 79:
682-707.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2005. ‘A Reply to the Critiques of “Grammar is Grammar and Usage
is Usage”.’ Language 81: 229-236.
Noël, Dirk. 2003. Believe-Type Matrix Verbs and their Complements: Corpus-Based
Investigations of their Functions in Discourse. A Collection of Articles. Ph.D.
Dissertation, Ghent University.
Nunberg, Geoff & C. Pan. 1975. ‘Inferring Quantification in Generic Sentences.’ CLS 11,
Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 412-422.
Oosterhof, Albert. 2003. ‘Reference to Hierarchically Ordered Kinds in Dutch.’ Leuven
Contributions to Linguistics and Philology 92: 119-140.
297
Oosterhof, Albert. 2003-2004. ‘Polariteitsgevoeligheid van doorgaan (‘gehouden worden’).’
TABU 33, 131-150.
Oosterhof, Albert. 2004. ‘Generic Noun Phrases in Dutch.’ Fred Karlsson (ed.) Proceedings
of the 20th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Helsinki, January 7-9, 2004.
(Publications no. 36). Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of General
Linguistics. 1-22.
Oosterhof, Albert. 2005. ‘Verbleekte Partitieven: Descriptieve, Syntactische en Semantische
Aspecten.’ Neerlandistiek.nl 5.
Oosterhof, Albert. 2006. ‘Dutch Bare Plurals, Faded Partitives and Subject-ObjectAsymmetry.’ In: Bare Plurals, Indefinites, and Weak-Strong Distinction (Belgian Journal
of Linguistics 19). Svetlana Vogeleer (ed.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 59-91.
Oosterhof, Albert. to appear. ‘De Empirische Basis van Semantisch Onderzoek.’ Gramma/ttt.
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. 2004. Generic NPs and Kind-Reference. Handout, Simon Fraser
University.
Pulman, Steve G. 1983. Word Meaning and Belief. London: Croom Helm.
Putnam, Hillary. 1975 ‘The Meaning of 'Meaning'.’ In: Hillary Putnam. Mind, Language and
Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rimell, Laura. 2004. ‘Habitual Sentences and Generic Quantification.’ To appear in G.
Garding & M. Tsujimura (eds.) WCCFL 23 Proceedings, Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla
Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. ‘The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.’ In: Liliane Haegemann (ed.)
Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 281-337.
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. ‘Principles of Categorization.’ In: Rosch, Eleanor and Barbara B.
Lloyd. (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 27-48.
Sánchez Valencia, Víctor M. 1996. ‘Essay Review: The Generic Book.’ History and
Philosophy of Logic 17: 221-231
Schmitt, Cristina and Alan Munn. 1999. ‘Against the Nominal Mapping Parameter: Bare
Nouns in Brazilian Portuguese.’ In: Pius Tamanji, Masako Hirotani & Nancy Hall (eds.)
Proceedings of NELS 29. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
Schütze, Carson. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Grammaticality, Judgements and
Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University Press.
Schwartz, Stephan P. 1979. ‘Natural Kind Terms.’ Cognition 7: 301-315.
Shlonsky, Uri & Isabelle De Crousaz. 2003. ‘The Distribution of a Subject Clitic Pronoun in a
Franco-Provençal Dialect and the Licensing of Pro.’ Linguistic Inquiry 34: 413-442.
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect. second edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Stubbs, Michael W. 2002. ‘On Text and Corpus Analysis: a Reply to Borsley and Ingham.’
Lingua 112: 7-11.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983 ‘The Possessor that Ran away from Home.’ The Linguistic Review 3:
89-102.
298
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. ‘The Noun Phrase.’ In: Ferenc Kiefer and Katalin Kiss. (eds.) Syntax
and Semantics 27: The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian. San Diego: Academic Press.
179-274.
Taeldeman, Johan. 1993. ‘Dialectresistentie en Dialectverlies op Fonologisch Gebied.’ In:
Frans Hinskens, Cor Hoppenbrouwers & Johan Taeldeman (eds.) Dialectverlies en
Regiolectvorming (Taal en Tongval Themanummer 6). 102-119.
Taraldsen, Tarald. 1990. ‘D-Projections and N-Projections in Norwegian.’ In: Marina Nespor
and Joan Mascaró (eds.) Grammar in Progress. Dordrecht: Foris. 419-431.
Ter Laan, Kornelis. 1953. Proeve van een Groninger Spraakkunst. Winschoten: Van der
Veen.
Ter Meulen, Alice. 1995. ‘Semantic Constraints on Type-shifting Anaphora.’ In: Gregory N.
Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book.. Chicago/London: The
University of Chicago Press. 339-357.
Torkildsen, Janne von Koss. 2002. ‘Representativity. Weak Interpretations of Definite Plural
Noun Phrases.’ Ms. University of Oslo.
Van Bart, Peter, Johan Kerstens & Arie Sturm. 1998. Grammatica van het Nederlands.
Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. Ellipsis in Dutch Dialects. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of
Leiden.
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Liliane Haegeman. to appear. ‘The Derivation of SubjectInitial V2.’ Linguistic Inquiry.
Van Den Heede, Vicky. 2000. ‘Corpusonderzoek: Doen of Laten?’ In: Veronique De tier,
Magda Devos & Jacques Van Keymeulen (eds.) Nochtans was Scherp van Zin.
Huldealbum Hygo Ryckeboer. Ghent: Vakgroep Nederlandse taalkunde, 429-438.
Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido. 1999. ‘Positively Polar.’ In Studia Linguistica 23: 209-226.
Van der Horst, Joop & Kees van der Horst. 1999. Geschiedenis van het Nederlands in de
Twintigste Eeuw. Den Haag/Antwerpen: Sdu/Standaard.
Van der Wal, Sjoukje. 1996. Negative Polarity Items and Negation: Tandem Acquisition.
Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen.
Van der Beek, Leonoor. 2005. Topics in Corpus Based Dutch Syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Groningen.
Vandeweghe, Willy. 2004. Grammatica van de Nederlandse Zin. Third revised edition.
Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant.
Van Koppen, Marjo. 2005. One Probe - Two Goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects.
Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Leiden.
Van Langendonck, Willy. 1971. ‘Over zgn. Generische Determinatoren.’ Studia Neerlandica
8: 351-384.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics and philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
299
Vennemann, Theo & Ray Harlow 1977. ‘Categorial Grammar and Consistent Basic VX
Serialization.’ Theoretical Linguistics 4: 227-254.
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1998. ‘O Corpora, O Mores.’ Nederlandse Taalkunde 3: 60-63.
Vogeleer, Svetlana (ed.) 2006. Bare Plurals, Indefinites, and Weak-Strong Distinction
(Belgian Journal of Linguistics 19). Svetlana Vogeleer (ed.) Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Wasow, Thomas & Jennifer Arnold. 2005. ‘Intuitions in Linguistic Argumentation.’ Lingua
115: 1481-1496.
Wilkinson, Karina. 1988. ‘The Semantics of the Common Noun ‘Kind’.’ In: Manfred Krifka
(ed.) Genericity in Natural Language. SNS-Bericht 88-42. University of Tübingen. 407429.
Wilkinson, Karina. 1991. Studies in the Semantics of Generic Noun Phrases. Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Wilmet, Marc. 1988. ‘Contre la Généricité.’ Lingua 75: 231-250.
Zamparelli, Roberto. 2002. ‘Definite and Bare Kind-denoting Noun Phrases.’ In: Claire
Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds.)
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000. 305–343.
Zamparelli, Roberto. 1995. Layers in the Determiner Phrase. Ph.D. Dissertation, University
of Rochester.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1997. Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. A Minimalist Approach to the
Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2003-2004. ‘Een Dynamische Structuur van de Nederlandse Zin. Deel 2:
de Nederlandse Zin.’ TABU 33: 151-172.
Zwarts, Frans. 1995. ‘Nonveridical Contexts.’ Linguistic Analysis 25: 286-312.
300